And she wasn't even Catholic. She wasn't even particularly-what was the term? Warm and fuzzy. But so what? Just because she wasn't the type to sit you down and hand you a lollipop didn't mean Sue Colussy wasn't your truest ally or your best hope.I also liked how Williams included lots of dialogue so that the reader was able to feel as though she personally knew the people in the story, and thus these people--who were really participants in a feature--became characters of her prose.
Williams also employs creative narrative styles. For instance, there are two examples on page 171:
Okay. One word and everything changed.And also:
Let's do this.
Okay.
Or was it more than one word?
Look, I've got this kid . . .
Reid, you speak French, don't you?
Let's do this.
Okay.
Here is your room, here is your bathroom, here is your closet.Williams writes as though she is just regurgiating the voiceover of Cynthia's first tour through the house. Williams change in use of a narrative voice and first and third person is very effective and powerful in making the reader pay attention the story as well as feel involved.
Anahita--great post. I like how you drew our attention to the ethical purpose of features--highlighting people like Sue C. whether we liked them personally or not. I would only suggest that when you allude to a argument vagules then include the quote [1st block quote] take a minute and explicitly explain to your reader the connection--rather than letter the readre figure that out for his/her self.
ReplyDelete